Spectrums; A way to weed out terrible ideas from good ones. Domesticating God for practicality.

dogphoto

Is it wrong to humanize, tame and domesticate the idea of God in a way where it is suitable for consumption and inheritance of what Godliness means? When I think of God I want to think of it as a nurturing force, as we homogenize milk made fit for our consumption of human beings. The question I ask is how can we make God beneficial to humanity? Should the idea of God be made secular (abiding to government), ethically and done with practicality? We do it everyday without considering this fact, so lets go all out on this idea. A tool, a friend and a overseeing father who has three possible functions in maintaining a meaningful perspective in life. As much as I want to have a beautiful exotic lion in the house, how practical would it be to keep this lion (I’ll call God for now) rather than a pet cat or dog. At the peril of getting eaten by one, mauled or injured I may not put up with the Lion. Where as a household pet with the potential and capabilities of God would be ideal. Just as you would prefer to surf the net or listen to music on your phone rather than on that clunky yet powerful, immobile, computer of yours, practicality is key.

I would rather have a pocket sized informative encyclopedia of ideal models of ideas of what makes up life rather then a primitive recollection of all the random events that lead up to modern day for example. This also depends on the situation or function which you require this form of information (book in this case) to be used. If you are looking for the roots of some religion about god. There are stories describing the roots of Christianity/The Bible, Islam/Quran and Jewish/Torah. If we can make a collective effort to map out the collection of ideas completely with alternatives included that would give oversight and weed out terrible ideas. The comparison of what is “to be” in the end and what was initially at the start is an unfair comparison but that is what is happening with this situation right now. People cannot be looking to a religious books for an expansion of knowledge but more so for insight. For example looking into a timeline where a person is tending goats, farming, punishing those for blasphemy, worrying about their next meal and where to fetch clean water more so than living in a city and dealing with laws of man, you cannot use these books based on their targeted timeline in a modern age.

This day and age, the idea of slavery is changed humanized to know it is wrong to own another human, discrimination is changed domesticated to know that we should be understanding of our differences yet step up when someone is intolerant of a person based on their racial identity, sexuality is changed civilized to understand that people are just born a certain way and to accept them. In this day and age a black, gay, Muslim man can exist in Britain, Canada or USA (many other countries) whereas the life expectancy of one in any other country in the middle east drastically goes down, why is this? If life was a popularity contest and popularity is based on agreement of what is fair and not Islam being the center of religious conflict divided even among its people would be losing and we need not any brains to identify why. It has a problem with intolerance, anti-gay and possibly even anti-woman.

I will admit i am intolerant of intolerance. I will not stand by to see a person be hateful and destructive towards another person’s life based on their intolerance. If ever i were to identify as a bigot i would identify as a bigot for bigotry. Which in my opinion we should all be, no one should sit by while someone is slut shaming, bullying or displaying great hate towards a special minority. In this case I may be pointing out that Islam has a problem and by me putting it on a spectrum where it is at the wrong i may be contradicting my ideas of being intolerant of intolerance. But there is a difference of being intolerant of intolerant action, and just being intolerant of intolerant thought. Just because I draw out a spectrum, identify which system i prefer, God I follow, and then come to the conclusion which is undesirable does not make me a hand of intolerance. I am simply an independent realization helping those see their options and opportunities. I have no radical interest or hand in where this intolerance goes, I am simply one who gives oversight of the situation, rerouting and inspiring.

The building of paradigms gives the ability for oversight which is the over seeing and assessing of all information as a collective, taking into consideration all aspects of life and putting it into a spectrum to be evaluated for yourself what comes first and last so we can weed out terrible ideas from decent ones. I plan to do this in my upcoming project. I have a neutral stance and completely open to ideas, I have no real agenda other then to help those have options, opinions and opportunities in the matter that is life. This is all just a healing process, I may just appear to be the scab (undesirable and ugly) but the end result will be better.

My life As Society’s Hobbit. Dispell The Word Evil

samandfrodo

Hobbit: Small people shorter then average with the ability to sneak by trouble quiet as a mouse. Let us dispell the delusion of genes. We all know that the genetic change of height is due to the generations of nutrition in mostly dairy and milk products accumulated throughout generations of life and their daily activity throughout life. We also know that the genes of a person for color of hair, or color of eyes is due to a mutation of genes due to a complex variety of variables like environment, or activity and sometimes just error in DNA coding. The amount of melanin in the skin can also cause darkness which helps protect us more from the radiation and harshness of the sun. The evolution to be able to soak more sunlight and soak more Vitamin D is a natural one through generations of living indoors and from more livable conditions. The mind is also a variable that is evolving that we still do not understand completely which controls the rate of these errors in coding but we also know coding can also be fatal in deformities and disorders. They can be a blessing and wonder but can also have a dark side in how many illnesses and disorders it can bring.

I am a Vietnamese guy from a war torn Lower Earth now communist country. Now, not to say communism is bad and that Facism any better. I believe the medium of the two is the child of the English and French two nations who were in great conflict before who have come together creating Canada the product child of some of the greatest nations in the world, a true representation of Democracy. This seems to be the medium or tame of the worlds extremes, i would call this Middle Earth. Where as Higher Earth would be with UK, Israel and Germany. Lower Earth would probably be China, Vietnam and Japan. I determined the Asia to be the Lower Earth and considered all things such as wealth, economics, health, overall appreciation for life and happiness. I also considered these categories because of the amount of conflict in those locations. It wasn’t difficult to say that Jewish have the upper hand on the conflict over the Islam conflict backed up by the worlds most powerful nations. The other countries not mentioned may have a hand in these conflicts but these are just sample sites of the most ideal candidates for living standards.

I have identified the most iconic sample sites to label my factors. Higher does not mean better and lower does not mean worse. They are frequencies. Highest pitched does not mean its better neither does lower. When put together they bring together a frequency that is in harmony and balanced. Only peaking and dipping to a standard amount in “Conflict/Chaos” but consistently moving forward in time changing it’s colors in succession maybe from cold to hot (can be measure of inefficiencies of energy use) or maybe even better brightness/luminescence. Considering that Lower Earth has traits such as intellect, balance, wisdom. Higher Earth would have control, abundance and power. Medium practicality, humanism and creativity and Maybe with this information we can determine a frequency or algorithm that is ideal best suited for life and set this as the standard frequency in which a society should set a standard to. That way we don’t over distribute and under distribute resources in a manner that makes life inefficient. Does it make sense to destroy what we can combine? What we lack we can help each other with. It doesn’t make sense for wisdom to fight and kill off power or creativity.

“Into the fire of Mt. Moridor Sam! We must destroy the ring!” We must destroy the ring of power. That is the ring that rules them all. If we are moving towards a place where we want to some how rule the entire planet. This mentality is wrong. We must work together as a people, as humanity to solve our human problems. We should be coming together for ideas and this is an idea i think people should contemplate on. The movement for “One World to rule the World”. Before the idea of who is best swallows us all and destroys all hope of ever lasting peace on Earth. Last i heard we might be learning Chinese pretty soon. Or run by a corporate rogue owned U.S.A. While Canada is doing it’s thing shy and timid, we are in the right position to press for something like this. We are in the correct political situation, condition and circumstance to tell the world what we want.

So why haven’t we?